Which British monarchs would have survived their health issues or wounding if today’s clinical know-how had existed then? (Bonus query: which monarchs would we have experienced but for diseases that are now quickly preventable?) Jane Shaw

Send out new issues to [email protected].

Readers reply

Richard I died of sepsis and gangrene 11 days after remaining shot in the shoulder with a crossbow bolt modern-day antibiotics would nearly undoubtedly have saved his lifetime. If he experienced lived, John would not have arrive to the throne and dropped most of England’s holdings in France, nor would the barons have rebelled and forced John to seal Magna Carta (and subsequent kings to reissue it). The modern-day earth, not just England, would be a pretty various place as a consequence. RichWoods

Richard was 41 when he died, with no genuine heirs. If he hadn’t died then, there is a superior probability he’d have got himself killed in some other armed service misadventure and John would have finished up in demand anyway. Moreover, a substantial part of why John shed so a lot French territory was that he could not pay for to defend it, in massive portion since of debts Richard experienced accrued by acquiring captured on the way household from the Crusades. It is not really obvious regardless of whether Richard living a couple several years lengthier would have produced any difference to that. Also, John acquired a papal bull nullifying Magna Carta virtually quickly. Subsequent kings only reissued it as a usually means of placating rebellious barons – they would presumably have experienced to have signed a identical treaty with the barons if it experienced hardly ever existed.

As to which people today may possibly have become monarchs if they’d experienced entry to present day medicine, Edward the Black Prince died from the consequences of dysentery he contracted on marketing campaign. He was an exceptionally well-liked determine in England and presumably would have created an helpful (if brutal) ruler, and his condition could be simply healed right now. Prince Arthur Tudor – Henry VIII’s more mature brother – died aged 15 at Ludlow castle after contracting some sort of respiratory an infection, possibly tuberculosis or influenza. He’d have a higher probability of survival nowadays. Prince Henry Stuart – Charles I’s more mature brother – died of typhoid fever aged 18, so in no way acquired to reign as King Henry IX. He would probably have been set suitable by a strong program of antibiotics. It’s intriguing to assume that two of the most pivotal rulers in English historical past only turned king through their elder brothers’ misfortune. There are some clear forks British historical past could have taken given fashionable healthcare intervention. ProjectXRay

John, signing a treaty and instantly attempting to nullify it? He was not an ancestor of our existing leader, was he? tpnrty

If Arthur experienced not died we’d all nonetheless be talking Latin and divorce would be illegal. As well as, Hilary Mantel might not have received two Bookers. lisamarie3

Had Edward I’s eldest surviving son not died at the age of 10, England would have had a King Alfonso and we would all be considerably superior at soccer. ButtockMcscruttock

Albert, Queen Victoria’s consort, would have almost surely have survived his tragic early death with modern day medication and therapy. If he had lived, it’s possible Victoria wouldn’t have been this sort of a distress and it’s possible Albert’s diplomatic expertise would have eased some of the tensions in the wider European family of monarchy, which contributed to the initially globe war. Cassandraknows2

I’m considerably less intrigued in monarchs and a lot more in composers. Mozart and Mahler nearly undoubtedly died of eminently treatable infective diseases that would have been very easily survivable now. Envision all that tunes that we have hardly ever read. Peter Neville, Powys

William the Conqueror ruptured his inner organs on the pommel of his saddle when his horse jumped a wall in Normandy and he subsequently died. Surgical intervention would pretty much absolutely have saved him. But that’s only the commencing of the tale. By the time he was transported to Caen Cathedral for his funeral he was as ripe as a camembert. Though lying in state there, the gases trapped in his abdomen escaped with a loud hissing audio and the stench despatched the group of assembled mourners fleeing from the cathedral. rumblestrips

Henry V died of dysentery at 35 throughout the siege of a French castle. Irrespective of all the lionising of him by Shakespeare and the rest, he continues to be a could possibly-have-been of historical past. Had he lived, he would have develop into king of both England and France in a year. The Wars of the Roses would have been much fewer likely and the Tudors definitely would not have risen to the throne. It is unlikely an English-French twin monarchy would have endured beyond his demise, but it is certainly an intriguing what-if. Ionic_bond

Alexander, prince of Scotland – son of King Alexander III of Scotland – died of an unspecified fever in 1284 at the age of 20. While I really do not know what kind of fever it was, I assume that contemporary drugs could have saved him. He would have succeeded his father as king, the Scottish lords would not have questioned Edward I of England to select a new king for them, William Wallace would have lived his lifestyle out as a minor member of the Scottish nobility and Braveheart would hardly ever have been created. BellaTheCook

Folic acid extra to her diet plan may well have prevented Elizabeth of York, wife of Henry VII, from succumbing to anaemia and dying in childbirth. Which may well in turn have prolonged Henry’s everyday living, stopped him from relying on Empson and Dudley, and possibly offered him a clearer, less grief-addled head when it arrived to protecting against Catherine of Aragon from marrying his second son. She could have been despatched again to Spain, Henry VIII could have made a superior marriage, experienced a son, and … probably no Reformation. Not that I’m in opposition to the Reformation. Asurea

Supposing Richard III’s wife and son could have been cured of no matter what organic cause they died of? No person in a position to distribute nasty rumours about how he experienced murdered his wife in purchase to marry his niece a authentic male heir nonetheless all over Henry Tudor could have considered two times, and we’d have experienced the King in the North for a little bit more time than two yrs. SpoilheapSurfer

Edward VI, the male heir that Henry VIII so desired, died at 15 most most likely of TB, which could be effortlessly taken care of today. A longer reign would have prevented the subsequent bloody turmoil of his successor, Mary, and possibly led to a more Protestant religious settlement (in comparison with the compromise enacted under Elizabeth I) being set up in England with the survival of its most vocal proponents (Cranmer, Latimer and Ridley, all executed by Mary). Even much more critically, if he experienced wed and sired an heir, the Tudor dynasty may well have ongoing for a ton lengthier, and the Stuarts would almost certainly have never occur to the throne (and consequently no subsequent own or political union with Scotland, or civil war/Cromwell). deepsubs

The accounts of Queen Caroline’s dying are harrowing (wife to George II). She had experienced an umbilical hernia at the delivery of her last kid in 1724 and, in November 1737, it was learned that part of her little intestine was poking by means of the opening. Her physicians reduce off the element that was protruding, as a result building it extremely hard for something to go through her entire body. She died days later on, in agony. It was certainly a case of “died of the doctors”. One of her daughters suffered from the similar situation. PMWoolley

Princess Charlotte, the daughter of George IV, died in childbirth alongside with her son. If she experienced survived, there would have been no Queen Victoria whose a lot of small children married into all the European royal family members. Picture: no Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany and no Tsarina Alexandra bringing haemophilia into the Russian royal family members. Whatduck

Mary II died at age 32 from smallpox her husband, William III, five a long time later from pneumonia. If they experienced lived a lot lengthier it is attainable that the dwelling of Hanover could possibly not have ascended the English throne. Floppyears

Modern drugs may in fact have saved Anne Boleyn. Henry is imagined to have experienced a brain damage in a drop, which afflicted his temperament. Right before it, he was intelligent, reasonable and generous. Following his fall he suddenly turned suspicious and aggressive. An MRI scan and mind surgical treatment could have succeeded. Anne would not have been executed and may have had a balanced son. No Bloody Mary with Catholic persecutions but regrettably no Elizabeth I either. But we may possibly even now be ruled by Tudors now alternatively of a German household. Shân Morgain, Newport

Certainly King Arthur would have been fine with modern antidepressants and psychotherapy: “No Arthur, there is no (living) woman in the lake, no magic sword and Merlin is a wise guy, not a ‘wizard’.” Walter Mennekens